SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MENDIS v. HUNUCUMBURA


Mendis V. Hunucumbura

1928 Present: Garvin J.

MENDIS v. HUNUCUMBURA

878-P. C. Kurunegala, 3,599.

Cruelty to animal-Shooting a trespassing cow-Unnecessary pain-Ordinance No. 13 of 1907, s. 4 (1) (b).

Where a person shot at a trespassing cow and injured it,-

Held that he was guilty of causing unnecessary pain to an animal within the meaning of section 4 (1) (6) of the Ordinance for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.

APPEAL from a conviction by the Police Magistrate of Kurunegala,

H. V. Perera, for accused, appellant.

February 24, 1928. GARVIN J.-

The facts material to the decision of the point raised by this appeal are simple and well ascertained. The accused saw his neighbor's cow trespassing on his land. He might easily have driven the animal away. Instead of doing so he fired a shot and injured it in the knee. The animal made away and was later found lying injured on its owner's land. The defence, which the Magistrate has rejected, was a denial by the accused that he shot at the cow as alleged.

The accused was in those circumstances convicted under section 4 (1) (b) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Ordinance, No. 13 of 1907. The case cannot b



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top