RAMBUKPOTA v. JAYAKODDY
1928 Present: Garvin and Drieberg JJ.
RAMBUKPOTA v, JAYAKODDY.
101-D. C. Kurunegala, 12,914.
Injunction-Prayer in plaint-Affidavit-Civil Procedure Code s. 662.
Where the plaint in an action includes a prayer for an interim injunction, the
application for the injunction must be supported by an affidavit.
APPLICATION to revise an order of the District Judge of Kurunegala.
Hayley, K.C (with Weerasooriya), for applicant. H. V. Perera, for respondent.
May 26, 1928. DRIEBERG J.-
The respondent brought this action on January 27, 1928, for a declaration of
title to a portion of land an acre in extent and part of his estate, which he
said the petitioner had taken forcible possession of .He alleged that through
this portion ran his estate road, and that the petitioner had blocked up this
road and prevented his use of it. In addition to the usual relief of declaration
of title, ejectment, and damages, he prayed for an injunction restraining the
petitioner from preventing his use of the road until the decision of the action.
When presenting the plaint the respondent's proctor moved for an interim
injunction on the petitioner. The Court allowed sum
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.