ANNAMALAY CHETTY v. THRONHILL
1928 Present :
Schneider and Lyall Grant JJ.
ANNAMALAY CHETTY v. THORNHILL.
168-D. C. (Inty.) Ratnapura, 4,687.
Res judicata-Action for goods delivered-Failure to register under
Business Names Ordinance-Institution of fresh action pending appeal-Merger of
claim-Civil Procedure Code, ss. 34 and 406.
In action No. 4,122 of the Court the plaintiff sued the defendant to recover a
sum of money upon a running account between them in respect of goods sold and
delivered and money advanced.
The defendant pleaded that the plaintiff had not complied with the requirements
of the Business Names Registration Ordinance, and that his action failed.
The plaintiff obtained judgment and the defendant appealed. While the appeal was
pending, the plaintiff having conformed to the requirements of the Ordinance
instituted the present action, in which the claim was founded upon the same
transactions as in the previous action save for the addition of a cause of
action based upon an account stated.
Held, that the plaintiff's claim was merged in the decree entered in the
previous case, and that the decree barred the second action.
IN
action No. 4,122
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.