SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RATTARANHAMY v. APPUNAIDE et al.


Rattaranhamy V. Appunaide Et Al.,

Present: Dalton J. and Jayewardene A J.

RATTARANHAMY .v. APPUNAIDE et al.

97-D. C. Ratnapurara, 4,607.

    Usufructuary mortgage-Agreement not to lease or mortgage-Subsequent mortgage-Bight of second mortgagee to discharge the previous mortgage-Authority.

The owner of certain property gave a usufructuary mortgage-to the defendants, covenanting that " he will not, during the continuance of this mortgage, lease or mortgage, the said premises or do any act or deed whatever, which may impeach the rents and income thereof, without the consent in writing first had and obtained."

Thereafter he gave another usufructuary mortgage to the plaintiffs, who were authorized to retain a portion of the consideration for the discharge of the previous mortgage.

Held, that the plaintiffs were entitled to redeem the mortgage granted to the defendants.

THIS was an action brought by the plaintiffs to redeem a usufructtuary mortgage granted by one Mohottihamy on September 16, 1922, in favour of the defendants to secure a sum of Rs. 350. On April 24, 1925, Mohottihamy executed a further usufructuary mortgage in favour of the plaintiffs for the































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top