PERIES v. ANDERSON
Present: Drieberg J,
PERIES v. ANDERSON.
591-P. C. Chilaw, 1,928.
Arrest-Retention of stolen property-Cognizable offence-Criminal Procedure Code,
s. 25.
A salesman in a boutique to whom a 2 5-cent piece was given for the purchase of
cigarettes by a chauffeur, employed by the appellant, denied the receipt of the
money. Immediately after, on being questioned by the appellant, the salesman
pointed to a 25-cent coin as it lay on the floor of the boutique: This
explanation was not accepted by the appellant, who found the 25-cent piece,
which he had given his chauffeur, in a drawer. The appellant used some degree of
force on the salesman in taking him in the Police Station.
Held that, under the circumstances, the salesman was not guilty of
dishonest retention of stolen property and that the action of the appellant in
removing him to the Police Station was unlawful.
Held also, that a person who commits dishonest misappropriation of
property cannot be convicted of dishonest retention of the property
misappropriated, where there was no appreciable interval of time between the
commission of the dishonest misappropriation and the manifestation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.