SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

WIJEYRATNE v. OBEYESEKERE


Wijeyratne V. Obeyesekere

Present: Drieberg J.

In the Matter of an Application for a Writ of quo warranto.

WIJEYRATNE v. OBEYESEKERE.

    Writ of quo warranto-Election of Village Committees-Notice of adjourned meeting-Legal defect-Motives of applicant-Village Communities Ordinance, No. 9 of 1924, s. 10 (2).

Where a meeting, which had been duly summoned for the election of a Village Committee under the Village Communities Ordinance, No. 9 of 1924, was adjourned by the presiding officer, who did not at the time of adjournment notify the time and place of the adjourned meeting as required by section 10 (2) of the Ordinance,-

Held, that the election could not be set aside on the ground of a legal defect, unless the Court was satisfied that the application was a bona fide one and was directed to relive a real grievance.

APPLICATION by way of quo warranto to set aside the election of a Committee for the village of Kosgoda held under the Village Communities Ordinance, No. 9 of 1924.

The application was made on the ground that the presiding officer in adjourning a previous meeting had not announced, as required by section 10 (2) of the Ordinance, the date of t






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top