UMMA SALOOMAR v. HASSIM
Present: Dalton
J. and Jayewardene A.J.
UMMA SALOOMAR v. HASSIM.
21-D. C. Colombo, 22,866.
Promissory note-Endorsement in blank-Negotiation by delivery- Holder for
value.
An endorsement in blank makes a note payable to bearer.
Such a note is negotiated by delivery and when value has been given for it, the
holder is a holder for value against all parties except the person from whom he
receives it.
The compromise of a claim may be a good consideration for a promissory note.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the District Judge of
Colombo. The plaintiff sued the defendant on a promissory note for Rs.
5,000 made by the defendant in favour of one S. L. Naina Marikar Hadjiar and
endorsed and delivered by the latter to her. The defendant denied that Naina
Marikar had endorsed and delivered the note to the plaintiff for valuable
consideration or that the plaintiff was the lawful holder thereof. The defendant
further pleaded that he granted the note to Naina Marikar to be held by him as
part security for the payment to a brother of the defendant, one Abdul Raheem,
of a sum of Rs. 15,000, in consideration of the said Raheem havi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.