GUNARATNE v. SOYSA et al.
Present: Lyall Grant J. 1928.
GUNARATNE v. SOYSA et al.
709-709A-P. C. Kalutara, 26,814.
Unlawful assembly-Common object-Offence to be specified-Penal Code, s. 138.
In a charge of being members of an unlawful assembly, the offence, which it was
the common object of such unlawful assembly to commit, must be specified.
APPEAL
from a conviction by the Police Magistrate of Kalutara. Rajapakse (with
Wendt), for appellant.
November 15, 1928. LYALL GRANT J.-
The three accused-appellants were charged (1) with being members of an unlawful
assembly whose common object was to commit an offence, (2) with voluntarily
causing simple hurt to ten persons with clubs and stones, and (3) with
committing mischief by damaging a bus.
All the accused were convicted and sentenced on each count. .. On appeal it was
objected--(1) That the Magistrate should not have tried this case as he
had previously received a complaint from "one of the complainants against
the accused, (2) that a charge of " ' Soysa being a member of an unlawful
assembly whose common object was to commit an offence must specify the offence,
(3) that there is no evidence against any o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.