FERNANDO v. FERNANDO
Present: Dalton J.
1929.
FERNANDO v. FERNANDO.
20-C. R. Chilaw, 22,727.
Right of way-Claim over three separate
lands-Partition decree in respect of one land without conserving the
right-Extinction of servitude.
Where the plaintiff claimed by prescription a right of way from his land to the
high road across three lands, owned severally by the defendants, and where a
partition decree had been entered in respect of one of the servient tenements
without the decree conserving the right of way,-
Held, that the right of way was extinguished.
A way of necessity is limited to the absolute necessities of the case.
THE plaintiff claimed
a right of way by prescription from his land, Bogahawatte, over three lands to
the Colombo-Chilaw high road. In the alternative he claimed a cart way of
necessity. The land immediately to the west of Bogahawatte was owned by first to
tenth defendants; then intervened the land belonging to the twelfth defendant,
and the land between it and the high road belonged to the heirs of one Domenico
Fernando. The first to tenth defendants and the eleventh and twelfth defendants
by their answer denied that the plaintiff
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.