SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

FERNANDO v. FERNANDO


Fernando V. Fernando

Present: Dalton J.     1929.

FERNANDO v. FERNANDO.

20-C. R. Chilaw, 22,727.

Right of way-Claim over three separate lands-Partition decree in respect of one land without conserving the right-Extinction of servitude.

Where the plaintiff claimed by prescription a right of way from his land to the high road across three lands, owned severally by the defendants, and where a partition decree had been entered in respect of one of the servient tenements without the decree conserving the right of way,-

Held, that the right of way was extinguished.

A way of necessity is limited to the absolute necessities of the case.

THE plaintiff claimed a right of way by prescription from his land, Bogahawatte, over three lands to the Colombo-Chilaw high road. In the alternative he claimed a cart way of necessity. The land immediately to the west of Bogahawatte was owned by first to tenth defendants; then intervened the land belonging to the twelfth defendant, and the land between it and the high road belonged to the heirs of one Domenico Fernando. The first to tenth defendants and the eleventh and twelfth defendants by their answer denied that the plaintiff



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top