SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GOONERATNAYAKA v. CLAYTON


Gooneratnayaka V. Clayton

Present : Fisher C.J., and Drieberg and Akbar JJ.

In the Matter of an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

GOONERATNAYAKA v. CLAYTON.

Habeas corpus-Custody of girl over sixteen years-Right of parents- Wishes of girl-Age of discretion.

Where a father -seeks to resume control of the custody of a girl of over sixteen years by a writ of habeas corpus.

Held, that it was competent to the Court to take into consideration the wishes of the girl, in determining the question of custody.

THIS was an application for a writ of habeas corpus by the petitioners, the parents of the second respondent, for the production of the body of their daughter, the second respondent, who was placed by the petitioners in the custody of the first respondent for education at a boarding school, of which the first respondent was the principal.

The second respondent was seventeen years of age. The question referred to a Bench of three Judges was whether the Court should take into consideration the wishes of the second respondent in determining the question of custody.

F. de Zoysa, K.C. (with W. M. de Silva), in support.-Under the Roman-Dutch law parental po













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top