MEIS SINGHO v. JOSIE PERERA
1929. Present :
Fisher C.J. and Drieberg J.
MEIS SINGHO v. JOSIE PERERA et al
116-D. C. (Inty.) Kurunegala, 3,247.
Compromise-Agreement filed in Court but not
notified in presence of parties-Binding character-Civil Procedure Code, s. 408.
Where an agreement, entered into between parties to testamentary
proceedings, was filed of record but was not notified to Court in the presence
of the parties as required by section 408 of the Civil Procedure Code,-
Held, that the Court was not bound to enter decree in accordance
with the terms of the agreement.
Such an agreement would not be bad because it wag not notarially executed.
APPEAL
from an order of the District Judge of Kurunegala.
H. V. Perera, for petitioner, appellant.
N. E. Weerasooria, for respondents.
September 16, 1929. DRIEBERG J.-
Simon Appuhamy died intestate on August 6, 1926, leaving as his heirs his widow,
Egi Nona, his brother, the appellant, and three sisters. The appellant applied
for letters of administration on May 26, 1927, and on June 29 the widow and
sisters agreed to the appointment of the appellant as administrator. In his
inventory filed with his applic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.