SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MEIS SINGHO v. JOSIE PERERA


Meis Singho V. Josie Perera

1929.   Present : Fisher C.J. and Drieberg J.

MEIS SINGHO v. JOSIE PERERA
et al

116-D. C. (Inty.) Kurunegala, 3,247.

Compromise-Agreement filed in Court but not notified in presence of parties-Binding character-Civil Procedure Code, s. 408.

Where an agreement, entered into between parties to testamentary proceedings, was filed of record but was not notified to Court in the presence of the parties as required by section 408 of the Civil Procedure Code,-

Held, that the Court was not bound to enter decree in accordance with the terms of the agreement.

Such an agreement would not be bad because it wag not notarially executed.
APPEAL from an order of the District Judge of Kurunegala.

H. V. Perera, for petitioner, appellant.

N. E. Weerasooria, for respondents.

September 16, 1929. DRIEBERG J.-

Simon Appuhamy died intestate on August 6, 1926, leaving as his heirs his widow, Egi Nona, his brother, the appellant, and three sisters. The appellant applied for letters of administration on May 26, 1927, and on June 29 the widow and sisters agreed to the appointment of the appellant as administrator. In his inventory filed with his applic

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top