KANDIAH v. KARTHIGESU
1929. Present : Fisher C.J.
and Drieberg J.
KANDIAH v. KARTHIGESU.
99-D. C. Jaffna, 23,599.
Action for declaration that the signature
of a deceased person is forgery- Recovery of property-Letters of
administration-Civil Procedure Code, s. 647.
Where an action was instituted to have it declared that the signature of a
deceased person to the discharge of a mortgage bond and the transfer of a land
were forgeries,-
Held, that the action was one for the recovery of property
belonging to the estate of the deceased within the meaning of section 547 of the
Civil Procedure Code.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the District Judge of Jaffna. The facts appear from the
judgment of the Chief Justice.
H. V. Perera (with N. E. Weerasooriya, Navaratnam, and Subramaniam), for
defendant, appellant.
Keuneman (with Ramachandra), for plaintiff, respondent.
November 4, 1929. FISHER C.J.-
In this case plaintiff prays for a declaration that an endorsement on a mortgage
bond (P 5) and a deed of transfer (P 4) are forgeries. After hearing a very
considerable body of evidence the learned Judge gave judgment in favour of the
plaintiff and a decree was issued decl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.