WICKREMASURIYA v. MUDIANSE
1930 Present: Fisher C.J. and
Garvin J.
WICKREMASURIYA v. MUDIANSE et al.
376-D. C. Kurunegala, 12,031
Ex parte trial-Non-appearance of
plaintiff-Dismissal of action- Court's power to vacate order-Application by
plaintiff-Reasonable time-Good cause shown-Civil Procedure Code, s. 144.
An order dismissing an action for failure of plaintiff to appear on the day
appointed for ex parte hearing May be vacated on terms if an application is made
within a reasonable time and good cause shown for default of appearance.
APPEAL from an order of the
District Judge of Kurunegala.
L. A. Rajapakse, for plaintiff, appellant.
No appearance for defendant, respondent.
March 25, 1930. GARVIN J.-
This was an action for declaration of title. The defendants who were duly served
with summons appeared in Court. The second and third defendants disclaimed title
; the first defendant took time to file answer. Further time was granted to him
on application. On June 21, 1928, the day ultimately appointed for the filing of
his answer the first defendant was absent and his proctor intimated to the Court
that he had no instructions. The District Judge fixed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.