SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

WALPOLA v. COOKE


Walpola V. Cooke

1929 Present: Lyall Grant J. and Maartensz A.J.

WALPOLA v. COOKE
.

88-D. C. {Inty.) Colombo. 25,455.

Mortgage Decree-Assignment by way of mortgage-Subsequent seizure in execution-Realization of security by decree-holder-Rights of mortgagee-Civil Procedure Code, s. 339.

A obtained judgment against X on a mortgage bond, and mortgaged the decree with B. Subsequently C, in execution of a decree against A, seized the mortgage decree, got himself substituted as plaintiff in the action and had the security realized.

Held, that C had a preferent right to the proceeds of sale.

THIS was a mortgage action in which the plaintiff, A obtained judgment against X for a sum of Rs. 8,480 and interest. Decree was entered on November 25, 1927. Plaintiff assigned the decree by way of mortgage to intervenient appellant B by deed No. 115 of January 21, 1928, which was registered in the register dealing with immovable property. The substituted plaintiff-respondent C, who was judgment-creditor in D. C, Colombo, No. 29,229, obtained decree in that case on August 23, 1928, and seized the decree in this case on August 30, 1928, under section 234 of the Civil Procedu














































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top