KING v. PERERA
Present: Jayewardene A.J.
1930
KING v. PERERA.
61-D. C. (Crim.) Nuwara Eliya, 145.
Handwriting expert.-Uncorroborated,
testimony of expert-Unsafe to convict.
It is not safe to base a conviction solely on the evidence of an expert in
handwriting.
APPEAL from a
conviction by the District Judge of Nuwara Eliya. - The facts appear from the
judgment.
R. L. Pereira, K.C. (with R. C. Fonseka), for accused appellant.
Crosette-Thambiah, C.C., for respondent.
July 9, 1930. JAYEWARDENE A.J.-
The accused was charged with dishonestly signing a false document, a pari-mutuel
pay-out chit for Rs. 1,000, on February 13, 1929, at Nuwara Eliya with the
intention of causing it to be believed that it was signed by one S. A. Perera,
and also with abetting the commission of the offence of criminal breach of trust
in respect of the said sum by some person unknown. The accused was convicted and
sentenced to six months' rigorous imprisonment.
The Ceylon Turf Club employs about twenty pay-out clerks, two supervisors, and a
cashier at Nuwara Eliya, who work inside one building. The pay-out clerks when
they require funds fill up a requisition and sign it, obtain
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.