SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KING v. PERERA


King V. Perera

 Present: Jayewardene A.J.  1930

KING v. PERERA.


61-D. C. (Crim.) Nuwara Eliya, 145.

Handwriting expert.-Uncorroborated, testimony of expert-Unsafe to convict.

It is not safe to base a conviction solely on the evidence of an expert in handwriting.

APPEAL from a conviction by the District Judge of Nuwara Eliya. - The facts appear from the judgment.

R. L. Pereira, K.C. (with R. C. Fonseka), for accused appellant.

Crosette-Thambiah, C.C., for respondent.

July 9, 1930. JAYEWARDENE A.J.-

The accused was charged with dishonestly signing a false document, a pari-mutuel pay-out chit for Rs. 1,000, on February 13, 1929, at Nuwara Eliya with the intention of causing it to be believed that it was signed by one S. A. Perera, and also with abetting the commission of the offence of criminal breach of trust in respect of the said sum by some person unknown. The accused was convicted and sentenced to six months' rigorous imprisonment.

The Ceylon Turf Club employs about twenty pay-out clerks, two supervisors, and a cashier at Nuwara Eliya, who work inside one building. The pay-out clerks when they require funds fill up a requisition and sign it, obtain



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top