SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CHAIRMAN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL COLOMBO v. SOERTSZ


Chairman, Municipal Council, Colombo V. Soertsz

Present: Fisher C.J. and Akbar J. 1930

CHAIRMAN, MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, COLOMBO, v. SOERTSZ
.

356-D. C. Colombo, 1,654.

Housing and Town Improvement Ordinance-Definition of street lines- Permission to build given to owner-Cancellation of street lines- Withdrawal of permission-Ordinance No. 19 of 1915, s. 18 (4).

A Municipal Council has no right to cancel street lines defined in pursuance of the powers vested in it under section 18 (4) of the Housing and Town Improvement Ordinance and to prohibit an owner from building within those street lines, where permission to build had been granted to him before the cancellation.

APPEAL from a decision of the Additional District Judge of Colombo in the form of a case stated to the Supreme Court under section 92 (1) of the Housing and Town Improvement Ordinance, No. 19 of 1915.

A street by the name of St. Mary's road, Bambalapitiya, less than 20 feet in width existed prior to 1915. In view of the provisions of Municipal section 18 (1) (a) of the Housing and Town Improvement Ordinance, No. 19 of 1915 no buildings could be erected adjoining St. Mary's road after the Ordinance





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top