SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

APPUHAMY v. HAY


Appuhamy V. Hay

1930 Present : Lyall Grant J.

APPUHAMY v. HAY.

247-M. C. Kandy, 2,786.

Municipal Councillor-Nominated member- Interest in contract-Municipal Councils Ordinance, No. 6 of 1910, s. 33.

Section 33 of the Municipal Councils Ordinance, which penalizes a Councillor who is concerned or interested in a contract made with the Council, applies to a nominated member.

APPEAL from an order of the Police Magistrate of Kandy. A charge was laid before the Magistrate that the accused, being a member of the Municipal Council of Kandy, was concerned or interested, otherwise than as a shareholder in a joint stock company, in a contract made with the Municipal Council of Kandy and had thereby committed an offence punishable under section 33 of Ordinance No. 6 of 1910.

When the complainant asked for summons, accused was represented by counsel who took objection to the issue of summons on the ground that the section applied only to elected members. The Magistrate upheld the objection and refused process. The complainant appealed.

L. A. Rajapakse, for complainant, appellant.-Section 33 is a general section, and clearly applies to nominated as well as to elected










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top