MUTTETUGAMA v. DHARMARATNA
1930 Present: Maartensz A. J.
MUTTETUGAMA v. DHARMARATNA.
440-p. C. Kalutara, 36,775.
Apothecary-Permitted to
practise medicine- Use of the title " Doctor "-Ordinance No. 26 of 1927, s. 41
(a).
A Government apothecary, who is permitted to practise medicine and surgery
under the Medical Ordinance, No. 26 of 1927, commits a breach of section 41 (a)
of the Ordinance by using the title " Doctor ".
APPEAL from a conviction by the Police Magistrate of Kalutara.
N.E. Weerasooria, for accused, appellant.
August 6,1930. MAARTENSZ A.J.-
The complaint against the accused in this case is that he described himself as "
Doctor ", thereby implying a qualification to practise medicine or surgery by
modern scientific methods, implying or tending to the belief that he was a
medical practitioner registered under the Ordinance. It has been' established
that the accused has not the necessary qualification to make that implication
and that he is not a medical practitioner registered under the Ordinance.
Two subsidiary questions were argued in support of the appeal by the accused :
(1) that he was entitled to plead autre fois acquit, as he had been
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.