SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JAYAWARDENE v. RATEMAHAMAYA OF KATUGAMPOLA


Jayawardene Ratemahamaya Of Katugampola

1930

Present: Maartensz A.J.

In the Matter of an Application for a Writ of quo warranto.

JAYAWARDENE, v. RATEMAHATMAYA OF KATUGAMPOLA.

Writ of quo warranto-Meeting under Village Communities Ordinance-Election of chairman-Procedure in counting votes-Resolution not seconded-Village Communities Ordinance, No. 9 of 1924.

Where, at a meeting of the inhabitants of a subdivision held under the Village Communities Ordinance, the resolution proposed in terms of section 16 of the Ordinance was that the Ratemahatmaya of the pattu should be the ex officio Chairman,-

Held, that the form of the resolution did not affect the validity of the decision that there should be an ex officio and not an elected chairman.

An irregularity in the method of counting the votes does not avoid an election so long as it did not affect the result.

A resolution which was put to the meeting, without being seconded, is not invalid.

APPLICATION for a writ of quo warranto to have the election of the respondents to the Village Committee of the subdivision of Dandagamuwa declared null and void.

A meeting of the inhabitants of the subdivision of Dandagamuwa



























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top