SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KING v. RANHAMY P.C.


King V. Ranhamy, P.C.,

1931

Present: Lyall Grant J.

(No. 17, 3rd Midland Circuit.)

KING v. RANHAMY.

P. C. Matale, 1,942.

Verdict-Charge of murders-Conviction for causing death by rash and negligent act- penal Code, s. 298.

Where an accused is indicted for murder, he may be convicted of causing death by a rash and negligent act.

THE accused was charged with murder before the third Midland Circuit held at Kandy, and the jury returned a verdict of causing death by a rash and negligent act.

The Judge in his charge to the jury said that they could find the prisoner guilty of murder, of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, of grievous hurt, or if they accepted the statement of the prisoner, they might consider that he acted rashly or negligently in using his gun, and if they so held they could find him guilty of causing death by a rash or negligent act under section 298 of the Penal Code. The jury convicted him under section 298.

No objection was taken at the trial either to the verdict or to the charge.

Some weeks later, Counsel for the prisoner raised the point that on a charge of murder it was not competent for the jury to bring in a verdict under se



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top