RODRIGO v. JINASENA & co.
1931 Present : Maartensz A. J.
RODRIGO v. JINASENA & CO.
227-C. R. Colombo, 50,838.
Prescription-Agreement to supply materials signed by plaintiff-Statement of
claim- Defendants letter making part payment- Repudiation of liability to pay
balance- Written agreement-Ordinance No. 22 of 1871, ss. 7, 9, and 13.
The plaintiff by a written agreement signed by him undertook to supply the
defendant with materials for a steel structure.
In reply to plaintiff's statement of claim the defendant made part payment and
by letter repudiated his liability to pay the balance owing to a defect in the
materials supplied.
Held, that the letter of the defendant did not amount to a written
acknowledgment within the meaning of section 13 of the Prescription Ordinance,
but that it may be relied upon to constitute a written agreement falling under
section 7, in which case the prescriptive period provided by the section will
apply.
THIS
was an action for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 160.80 the balance value of
materials supplied to the defendant for a steel structure in August, 1927. The
action was filed in February, 1929. The defence set up the plea of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.