SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KING v. GODAMUNE


King V. Godamune

1931 Present : Macdonell C.J., Garvin S.P.J., and Dalton J.

IN THE MATTER OF A REFERENCE UNDER
SECTION 355 (2) OF THE CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE CODE.

THE KING v. GODAMUNE.

41-P. C. Kandy, 32,498.

Criminal misappropriation-Trust property-Payment of interest to trustee- Appropriation of payments -Particulars in charge-Ownership of property misappropriated-Direction to jury.

By the terms of a marriage settlement, H, the owner of Belmont estate, settled a sum of Rs. 40,000 upon two trustees, of whom the accused was one, in trust for certain beneficiaries. H sold the estate to B and the trust fund was invested and secured by a mortgage of the estate in favour of the trustees. At the dates material to the prosecution, the accruing interest was payable to H.

No interest having been paid for some years, an action was instituted in the District Court of Kandy by the trustees to recover the principal sum and the accumulated interest, which amounted to Rs. 23,126. Prior to the institution of the action, B had executed a conveyance of the estate in favour of a certain syndicate and they were made parties to the action for the purpose of affecting the prop
































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top