DINGIRI AMMA v. MUDIYANSE et al.
1931 Present: Akbar J.
DINGIRI AMMA v. MUDIYANSE et al.
115-C. R. Matale, 521.
Sale-Deed of transfer with
stipulation of good title-Action for failure to warrant and defend and for
breach of covenant-(audition of notice and eviction-Roman Dutch law.
Where a deed of transfer contained an express covenant that the vendor had "
legal right to dispose of the land," the express warranty of title may be
enforced . without the preliminary condition of notice and eviction.
IN
this action the plaintiff sued the defendants
for the recovery of half the purchase money and damages consequent on failure of
the defendants to warrant and defend title conveyed by their father,
Ranhamy.
Ranhamy sold the entirety of the northern 12 lahas paddy sowing of
Kanatiangekumbura on deed No. 442 of September 21, 1921, to plaintiff. Ranhamy
expressly covenanted that he had good and lawful title to the premises. In 1928,
plaintiff was ousted from the eastern 6 lahas by the heirs-at-law of Punchirala,
brother of Ranhamy. Plaintiff then instituted case No. 19,250, C. R. Matale,
against the heirs-at-law of Punchirala for declaration of title to this eas
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.