SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

EBRAHIM v. THIAGARAJAH et al.


Ebrahim V. Thiagarajah, Et Al.,

1931 Present: Drieberg J. and Akbar J.

EBRAHIM v. THIAGARAJAH et al.

26 D. C. (Inty.) Colombo, 35,982.

Sequestration before judgment-Sale in execution of decree-Fiscal's transfer executed-Application for delivery of possession-Property under mortgage-Bond not reduced to decree-Application by mortgagee to stay delivery of possession-Civil Procedure Code, s. 287.

The plaintiff in an action for the recovery of an unsecured debt applied for and obtained a writ of sequestration before judgment and seized a property belonging to the defendant. In execution of his decree the property was sold and purchased by the plaintiff, in whose favour a Fiscal's transfer was issued.

Thereafter the plaintiff applied under section 287 of the Civil Procedure Code for an order of delivery of possession.

The petitioner, who held a mortgage over the property, which had not been reduced to a decree, moved to have delivery of possession to the plaintiff stayed.

Held, that the petitioner-mortgagee was not entitled to have delivery of possession to plaintiff stayed.

APPEAL from an order of the District Judge of Colombo.

Hayley K.C. (with him Tissev

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top