SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GOVERNMENT AGENT CENTRAL PROVINCE v. BEEMAN


Government Agent, Central Province V. Beeman

1932 Present: Drieberg J.

GOVERNMENT AGENT, CENTRAL PROVINCE v. BEEMAN.

978-P. C. Panwila, 17,309.

Motor car-Possession by registered owner-Defence that car is unserviceable-Exemption from liability to obtain licence-Duty of owner to cancel registration-Ordinance No. 20 of 1927, s. 24.

The registered owner of a motor car, who claims to be exempt from liability to obtain a licence for it on the ground that it is unserviceable, must procure a cancellation of the registration under section 24 of the Motor Car Ordinance.

THE accused-appellant was charged under section 20 (1) of the Motor Car Ordinance, No. 20 of 1927, with possessing or using a motor car without a licence for the year 1931. The Police Magistrate convicted the accused and condemned him under section 30 (3) of the Ordinance to-pay the amount of the licence.

Wendt, C.C., for the respondent.-The judgment of the Police Magistrate is right.

Section 18 (1) of Ordinance No. 20 of 1927 indicates that the person who is required to be registered as the owner of a car is the person who at the time is entitled to possession of the car. When a person applies to be


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top