GOVERNMENT AGENT CENTRAL PROVINCE v. BEEMAN
1932 Present: Drieberg J.
GOVERNMENT AGENT, CENTRAL PROVINCE v. BEEMAN.
978-P. C. Panwila, 17,309.
Motor car-Possession by registered owner-Defence that car is
unserviceable-Exemption from liability to obtain licence-Duty of owner to cancel
registration-Ordinance No. 20 of 1927, s. 24.
The registered owner of a motor car, who claims to be exempt from
liability to obtain a licence for it on the ground that it is unserviceable,
must procure a cancellation of the registration under section 24 of the
Motor Car Ordinance.
THE
accused-appellant was charged under section 20 (1) of the Motor Car
Ordinance, No. 20 of 1927, with possessing or using a motor car without a
licence for the year 1931. The Police Magistrate convicted the accused and
condemned him under section 30 (3) of the Ordinance to-pay the amount of the
licence.
Wendt, C.C., for the respondent.-The judgment of the Police Magistrate is right.
Section 18 (1) of Ordinance No. 20 of 1927 indicates that the person who is
required to be registered as the owner of a car is the person who at the time is
entitled to possession of the car. When a person applies to be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.