MOHAMED SHERIFF v. MUTTU NATCHIA
1932 Present: Garvin S.P.J.
and Drieberg and Akbar JJ.
MOHAMED SHERIFF v. MUTTU NATCHIA
170-D. C. (Inty.) Kalutara, 1,031.
Privy Council-Application for conditional leave-Judicial settlement-Order on
executor to give list of mortgage bonds and other debts-Reasons for non-recovery
of debts-Final order-Ordinance No. 31 of 1909, rule 1 (a).
In an application for
judicial settlement by an executor the District Judge, after dealing with the
case of one mortgage bond, ordered the executor to file a detailed list of the
other bonds and debts of the estate, showing what steps he took and what amounts
he recovered in each-case and the reason for non-recovery. The Supreme Court
affirmed the order.
Held (in an application for leave to appeal to the Privy Council), that the
order had the effect of a final judgment and that the executor was entitled to
have leave to appeal.
APPLICATION
for conditional leave to appeal to the Privy Council from an order
made in the course of an application for judicial settlement by an executor.
Choksy, for executor, appellant (with him Canekeratne and Jayawickrama).-The
judgment is final because it fi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.