SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DE ZOYSA v. WIMALASURIYA et al.


De Zoysa V. Wimalasuriya Et Al.,

1931 Present : Maartensz A.J.

DE ZOYSA v. WIMALASURIYA et al.

151-2-P. C. Balapitiya 16,258.

Process server-Executing process outside division-Resistance to officer- Fiscals' Ordinance, No. 4 of 1867, s. 8.

A person licensed to serve and execute process in the division of a district has no authority to execute a process outside his division.

APPEAL from a conviction by the Police Magistrate of Balapitiya.

N. E. Weerasooriya, for appellant.

Amarasekera, for respondent.

September 28, 1931. MAARTENSZ A.J.-

The two accused in this case, A. S. Wimalasuriya and George Jayasekere, appeal from a conviction under section 181 of the Penal Code. They were convicted of offering resistance to and preventing R. D. G. de Zoysa of Madampe, a Fiscal's Arachchi, from taking certain movable property seized in possession of the first accused in execution of a writ issued in case No. 29,234 of the District Court of Galle, against the first accused.

The accused have appealed both on the law and on the facts.

I am not prepared to interfere with the learned Magistrate's finding on the facts.

The objection to the conviction on the law is tha















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top