SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VANDERSTRAATEN v. NARAYANASWAMY


Vanderstraaten V. Narayanaswamy

1932 Present : Macdonell C.J. and Garvin S.P.J.

VANDERSTRAATEN v. NARAYANASWAMY.

39-P. C. Matale, 4,968.

Motor car-Cab licensed to carry passengers-Used for conveying mails- Infringement of licence-Ordinance No. 20 of 1927, ss. 30 and 31:

It is an offence to use a motor cab licensed to carry passengers for conveying mail bags.

CASE referred by Akbar J. to two Judges. The accused, the driver of a motor cab licensed to carry passengers, was convicted of a breach of section 31 of the Motor Car Ordinance in that he used the car in contravention of the conditions inserted in his licence, to carry mailbags.

It would appear that the accused carried a few mail bags on behalf of the owner, who had a contract with the Postmaster-General for the carriage of mails.

E. Navaratnam (with him C. T. Olegesagaram), for accused, appellant.-

There is no provision in the Ordinance which accused has contravened. There is no express prohibition against carriage of goods in hiring car.

In case of omnibuses there is express provision made for carriage of goods. There is no such provision in case of hiring car.

Section 31 does contemplate the































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top