PRINS v. SABARATNAM
1932 Present :
Jayewardene A.J.
PRINS v. SABARATNAM.
485-P. C. Colombo, 39,093.
Opium Ordinance-Seizure of opium, in accused's possession-Failure to seal
before removal to Police Station-Irregularity not fatal.
There is no inflexible rule that excise articles seized should be sealed
immediately after seizure in the presence of the accused, before they are :
taken to the Police Station.
It depends on the circumstances of each case whether the failure to seal in the,
presence of the accused affords a good defence or not.
APPEAL
from a conviction by the Police
Magistrate of Colombo.
No appearance for appellant.
H. L. Wendt, C.C., for respondent.
August 24, 1932. JAYEWARDENE A.J.-
The accused has been convicted under the Opium Ordinance, 1910, for possessing
four pounds of opium. On April 24, Inspector Prins, having received certain
information, followed the accused from the Maradana Railway Station after the
arrival of the Jaffna train at 6.30 A.M. He stopped the accused's rickshaw
opposite the Socony Petrol Station in Skinner's road south and took the accused
inside the depot. He opened the accused's trunk with a key which the accused
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.