HUSSAN v. PEIRIS et al.
1932 Present :
Macdonell C.J., Garvin S.P.J., and Dalton J.
HUSSAN v. PEIRIS et al.
209-D. C. Kalutara, 14,612.
Jurisdiction-Partition
action-Several defendants-Residence-Test of jurisdiction-Any defendant-Courts
Ordinance, s. 65 and Civil Procedure Code, s. 9 (a).
An action may be brought in a District Court where any party defendant resides,
viz., any defendant against whom the right to any relief is alleged to exist.
A party defendant in section 65 of the Courts Ordinance and in section 9 (a) of
the Civil Procedure Code means any party defendant.
THIS
was an action in which the plaintiff sued
the defendants all resident within the jurisdiction of the District Court of
Kalutara to partition a land, situate at Beruwala, a place beyond the
jurisdiction of the Kalutara Court. The intervenients, who were residents at
Beruwala, claimed a portion of the land and pleaded that the Court had no
jurisdiction. The District Judge upheld the plea and dismissed the action.
N. E. Weerasooria (with him D. E. Wijewardene), for plaintiff-appellant. -There
is no question that the District Court of Kalutara had jurisdiction at the
commencement of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.