VAN CUYLENBERG v. SELLAMUTTU
1933 Present: Dalton
S.P.J.
VAN CUYLENBERG v. SELLAMUTTU.
571-P. C. Colombo, 42,514.
Refusal to answer questions
put by Public Servant-Person questioned under section 122 (2) of the Criminal
Procedure-Penal Code, s. 177.
A refusal to answer questions put to a person under the provisions of
section 122 of the Criminal Procedure Code may form the basis of a charge under
section 177 of the Penal Code.
APPEAL
from a conviction by the Police
Magistrate of Colombo.
R. L. Pereira, K.C. (with him H. V. Perera and T. F. C. Roberts), for
accused, appellant.
Illangakoon, S.-G. (with him M. F. S. Pulle, C.C.), for complainant,
respondent.
April 12, 1933. DALTON S.P.J.-
The appellant, Nagendra Sellamuttu, was charged with committing an offence under
section 177 of the Penal Code, namely, being a person legally bound under
section 122 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code to answer all questions relating
to an offence, namely, an offence under section 298 of the Penal Code relating
to the violent death of one W. Podisingho, put to him by the complainant F. A.
van Cuylenberg, Inspector of Police, he did on July 15th, 1932, refuse to answer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.