SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VAN CUYLENBERG v. SELLAMUTTU


Van Cuylenberg V. Sellamuttu

1933 Present: Dalton S.P.J.

VAN CUYLENBERG v. SELLAMUTTU.

 571-P. C. Colombo, 42,514.

Refusal to answer questions put by Public Servant-Person questioned under section 122 (2) of the Criminal Procedure-Penal Code, s. 177.

 A refusal to answer questions put to a person under the provisions of section 122 of the Criminal Procedure Code may form the basis of a charge under section 177 of the Penal Code.

APPEAL from a conviction by the Police Magistrate of Colombo.

R. L. Pereira, K.C. (with him H. V. Perera and T. F. C. Roberts), for accused, appellant.

Illangakoon, S.-G. (with him M. F. S. Pulle, C.C.), for complainant, respondent.

April 12, 1933. DALTON S.P.J.-

The appellant, Nagendra Sellamuttu, was charged with committing an offence under section 177 of the Penal Code, namely, being a person legally bound under section 122 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code to answer all questions relating to an offence, namely, an offence under section 298 of the Penal Code relating to the violent death of one W. Podisingho, put to him by the complainant F. A. van Cuylenberg, Inspector of Police, he did on July 15th, 1932, refuse to answer
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top