HAYLEY et al. v. NUGAWELA
1933 Present: Drieberg
J. and de Silva A.J.
HAYLEY et al. v. NUGAWELA.
160-D. C. (Inty.) Kandy, 40,294
Trustee-Action on contract
entered into as trustee-Personal libability- Decree entered against defendant as
trustee-Right of defendant to compel judgment-creditor to levy execution against
trust property-Trustee under Buddhist Temporalities Ordinance not a corporation.
Where a trustee contracts as trustee and judgment is entered against him as
such, he is not entitled to compel the judgment-creditor, who seeks to execute
the judgment against him personally, to levy execution instead on the trust
property.
The mere use of the words " as trustee " in a contract is not sufficient to
execute personal liability.
A trustee appointed under the Buddhist Temporalities Ordinance is not a
corporation.
THIS
was an action to recover the value of cement delivered to the defendent on a
contract entered into by him as the Diyawadana Nilame and Trustee of the Dalada
Maligawa. The action was not defended and judgment was entered against the
defendant on March 3,
1931. In the caption of the
plaint the defendant was described as the Diyawadana N
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.