SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KANNIAH v. MANICAM


Kanniah V. Manicam

1934 Present: Garvin S.P.J. and Akbar J.

KANNIAH v. MANICAM

120-D. C. Kandy, 42,815.

Promissory note-Rate of interest left blank-Insertion of rate without authority-Material alteration-Ordinance No. 25 of 1927, s. 20 (2).

The insertion of a rate of interest in a promissory note without authority is a material alteration of the note.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Judge of Kandy.

H. V. Perera (with him E. F. N. Gratiaen), for the defendant, appellant.

Rajapakse (with him J. R. Jayawardene), for the plaintiff, respondent.

February 21, 1934. GARVIN S.P.J.-

This was an action by the payee against the maker of a promissory note. He sought to recover a sum of Rs. 300, being the principal sum due on the note, and a sum of Rs. 193.50, being the interest which he said was payable in terms of the note. The defendant filed an answer in which he took various defences, among them one being that there had been a failure of consideration. The case proceeded to trial upon the single issue: " Was there a failure of consideration on the promissory note ' A' dated January 15, 1929, for Rs. 300". Now this promissory note is in the ordinary form














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top