DON DAVID v. DON SIMON
1934 Present:
Garvin S.P.J, and Dalton J.
DON DAVID v. DON SIMON.
44-(Inty.) D. C. Matara, 7,739.
Partition
action-Summons served on defendant-No notice of trial on defendant-Ex parte
proceedings-Ordinance No. 10 of 1863, s. 4.
Where, in a partition action, the defendant on service of summons was absent on
the day appointed for his appearance, he is not entitled to receive notice of
the day of trial.
In such circumstances the Court is required to proceed to hear the evidence and
investigate the title of the respective parties in so far as may be practicable
by an ex parte proceeding.
APPEAL
from an order of the District Judge of Matara.
Mr. T. de S. Ameresekere for the defendant appellant.
E. F. N. Gratiaen (with him S. Alles), for the plaintiff, respondent.
August 1, 1934. GARVIN S.P.J.-
This is a proceeding under the Partition Ordinance. In the plaint the
persons disclosed as having interests in this land are the plaintiff and the
defendant alone. The plaintiff claimed that he was entitled to 1/3 and assigned
the remaining 2/3 to the defendant. In due course summons was issued upon the
defendant and on October 18, 1932, th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.