SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DON DAVID v. DON SIMON


Don David V. Don Simon

1934 Present: Garvin S.P.J, and Dalton J.

DON DAVID v. DON SIMON.

44-(Inty.) D. C. Matara, 7,739.

    Partition action-Summons served on defendant-No notice of trial on defendant-Ex parte proceedings-Ordinance No. 10 of 1863, s. 4.

Where, in a partition action, the defendant on service of summons was absent on the day appointed for his appearance, he is not entitled to receive notice of the day of trial.

In such circumstances the Court is required to proceed to hear the evidence and investigate the title of the respective parties in so far as may be practicable by an ex parte proceeding.

APPEAL from an order of the District Judge of Matara.

Mr. T. de S. Ameresekere for the defendant appellant.

E. F. N. Gratiaen (with him S. Alles), for the plaintiff, respondent.

August 1, 1934. GARVIN S.P.J.-

This is a proceeding under the Partition Ordinance. In the plaint the persons disclosed as having interests in this land are the plaintiff and the defendant alone. The plaintiff claimed that he was entitled to 1/3 and assigned the remaining 2/3 to the defendant. In due course summons was issued upon the defendant and on October 18, 1932, th




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top