GOUL v. CONCECION
1934 Present:
Garvin S.P.J, and Akbar J.
GOUL v. CONCECION.
265-D. C. Colombo, 51,740.
Public
Servants' Liabilities Ordinance-Salary-Meaning of term-Does not include
allowances-Ordinance No. 2 of 1899, s. 3 (2).
The term "salary" in section 3 (2) of the Public Servants' Liabilities Ordinance
means the regular remuneration received by a person in respect of his fixed
appointment in the public service and does not include allowances that may be
granted to him.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the District Judge of
Colombo.
Croos DaBrera, for the defendant, appellant.
Nadarajah (with him Wikramanayake) for the plaintiff, respondent.
July 12, 1934. GARVIN S.P.J,-
This was an action on a promissory note. The defendant is undoubtedly a public
servant, and, quite apart from the other defences taken by him he has pleaded
the benefit of the Public Servants' Liabilities Ordinance, No. 2 of 1899. The
learned District Judge has, however, held that he
was not entitled to these
benefits upon the ground that the protection afforded by the Ordinance is
limited to public servants in receipt of a salary of less than Rs. 3,000 a year.
In this the learned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.