SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KING v. WICKREMASINGHE


King V. Wickremasinghe

1934 Present: Maartensz A.J.

[FIRST WESTERN SESSIONS, 1934. ]

KING v. WICKREMASINGHE.

49-P. C. Colombo, 4,165.

    Joinder of charges-Three offences against three different persons-Evidence of similar acts-Criminal Procedure Code, s. 179-Evidence Act, s. 14.

Where an accused was charged with having committed three acts of indecency with three different persons within a period of twelve months,-

Held, that the inclusion of the charges against three different persons in the same indictment was not obnoxious to section 179 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Held, further, that the evidence of similar acts committed by the accused on the persons mentioned in the indictment was inadmissible.

Held, also, that separate trials should not be ordered in such a case merely because of the possibility that a Judge or Jury might suspect each of them to be true.

THE accused was charged before the First Western Sessions of the J- Supreme Court with having committed three acts of gross indecency with three different boys within a period of twelve months.

E. H. T. Gunasekera, C.C., for the Crown.

S. W. R. Dias Bandaranayake (with him Rajakaruna), fo
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top