SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RUBEN v. SHEENGHYE


Ruben V. Sheenghye

1934 Present: Akbar J.

RUBEN
v. SHEENGHYE.

120-P. C. Kandy, 43,308.

    Dentists, Registration of-Dental operation or service-Meaning of expression- Fitting of artificial teeth-Ordinance No. 3 of 1915, s. 18 (1).

The expression "dental service" in section 18 (1) of the Dentists Registration Ordinance would include the act of making artificial teeth to fit the gap in the teeth of the person to whom the service is done and of fixing it into position.

APPEAL from a conviction by the Police Magistrate of Kandy.

Athulathmudali, for accused, appellant. March 16, 1934. AKBAR J.-

The accused was convicted under section 18 (1) (c) of the Registration of Dentists Ordinance, No. 3 of 1915, because he had performed for gain a dental operation or service on November 24 last, in that he had fitted on an artificial tooth to one Punchiappu without being registered as a qualified dentist under that Ordinance. He has been fined Rs. 50. The appeal is from this conviction and fine.

Under the sub-section the prosecution must prove three elements, namely: (1) that the accused was not a registered dentist under the Ordinance, (2) that he performed a servi









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top