RUBEN v. SHEENGHYE
1934 Present:
Akbar J.
RUBEN v. SHEENGHYE.
120-P. C. Kandy, 43,308.
Dentists,
Registration of-Dental operation or service-Meaning of expression- Fitting of
artificial teeth-Ordinance No. 3 of 1915, s. 18 (1).
The expression "dental service" in section 18 (1) of the Dentists Registration
Ordinance would include the act of making artificial teeth to fit the gap in the
teeth of the person to whom the service is done and of fixing it into position.
APPEAL
from a conviction by the Police Magistrate of
Kandy.
Athulathmudali, for accused, appellant. March 16, 1934. AKBAR J.-
The accused was convicted under section 18 (1) (c) of the Registration of
Dentists Ordinance, No. 3 of 1915, because he had performed for gain a dental
operation or service on November 24 last, in that he had fitted on an artificial
tooth to one Punchiappu without being registered as a qualified dentist under
that Ordinance. He has been fined Rs. 50. The appeal is from this conviction and
fine.
Under the sub-section the prosecution must prove three elements, namely: (1)
that the accused was not a registered dentist under the Ordinance, (2) that he
performed a servi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.