THE GOVERNMENT AGENT PROVINCE OF SABARAGAMUWA v. PERIES
1934 Present:
Drieberg J.
THE GOVERNMENT AGENT, PROVINCE OF SABARAGAMUWA v. PERIES
950-P. C. Ratnapura, 3,742
Motor car-Possession of motor
car without licence-Proof of user not necessary-Ordinance No. 20 of 1927, ss. 2
(2) and 30 (I).
In a charge under section 30 (1) of possessing a motor car without a licence no
proof is necessary of its user during the period when there was no licence in
force.
APPEAL
from an acquittal by the Police
Magistrate of Ratnapura.
Wickremanayake, C.C., for complainant, appellant.
Cur. adv. vult.
December 17, 1934.
DRIEBERG J.-
The accused was charged with having possessed or used a motor car for which a
motor car licence was not in force. This is an offence under section 30 (1) of
the Motor Car Ordinance, No. 20 of 1927. On June 21 he pleaded not guilty and
the trial was fixed for July 4. On the day of trial the accused admitted that
the car was registered in his name. There was some discussion regarding the
application of some authority. It was stated for the accused that the car was
non-existent; the learned Police Magistrate said that without expressing an
opinion
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.