SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GOONESEKERE v. APPUHAMY


Goonesekere V. Appuhamy

1935  Present: Maartensz J.

GOONESEKERE
v. APPUHAMY.

 1,255-P. C. Dandagamuwa, 15,676.

Public servant-Offering obstruction to discharge of duties-Using force to prevent discharge of duty-Legality of public servant's act-Penal Code, ss. 183 and 344.

Where a public servant, who was obstructed, was not acting with lawful authority, a person who resisted him cannot be convicted under section 183 of the Penal Code of obstructing a public servant in the discharge of his public functions or under section 344 of using force with intent to prevent him from discharging his duty as public servant.

A person cannot be convicted under these sections unless the act of the public servant was strictly legal.

APPEAL from a conviction by the Police Magistrate of Dandagamuwa.

Siri Perera, for accused, appellant.

Weerasooria (with him Eric de Soysa), for complainant, respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

March 12, 1935. MAARTENSZ J.-

This is an appeal by the first accused in this case who was convicted of (1) obstructing R. S. Goonesekere, Additional Deputy Fiscal, a public servant, in the discharge of his public functions, to wit, the execution of an order of

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top