GOONESEKERE v. APPUHAMY
1935 Present:
Maartensz J.
GOONESEKERE v. APPUHAMY.
1,255-P. C. Dandagamuwa, 15,676.
Public servant-Offering
obstruction to discharge of duties-Using force to prevent discharge of
duty-Legality of public servant's act-Penal Code, ss. 183 and 344.
Where a public servant, who was obstructed, was not acting with lawful
authority, a person who resisted him cannot be convicted under section 183 of
the Penal Code of obstructing a public servant in the discharge of his public
functions or under section 344 of using force with intent to prevent him from
discharging his duty as public servant.
A person cannot be convicted under these sections unless the act of the public
servant was strictly legal.
APPEAL
from a conviction by the Police Magistrate of Dandagamuwa.
Siri Perera, for accused, appellant.
Weerasooria (with him Eric de Soysa), for complainant, respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
March 12, 1935. MAARTENSZ J.-
This is an appeal by the first accused in this case who was convicted of (1)
obstructing R. S. Goonesekere, Additional Deputy Fiscal, a public servant, in
the discharge of his public functions, to wit, the execution of an order of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.