SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ROOSEMALACOCQ v. SALLY


Roosemalacocq V. Sally

1935 Present : Koch A.J.

ROOSEMALACOCQ v. SALLY.

227-P. C. Colombo, 28,570.

Plea of guilt-Failure to record verdict-Application to withdraw appeal-Refusal of permission-Subsequent verdict of guilt-Irregularity- Criminal Procedure Code, s. 188 (1).

On a plea of guilt being tendered by an accused, the Magistrate did not record a verdict of guilty, but remanded the accused for identification. On the next date the accused asked that the evidence of a witness be recorded. When this request was complied with, the accused withdrew his plea of guilt and pleaded not guilty.

The Magistrate refused the application to withdraw the plea of guilt and convicted the accused.

Held, that it was the duty of the Magistrate on the plea of guilt being tendered to record a verdict of guilty and pass sentence; and that, in the circumstances, the subsequent verdict could not stand.

APPEAL from a conviction by the Police Magistrate of Colombo.

L. A. Rajapakse, for accused, appellant.

Cur. adv. vult.

July 8, 1935. KOCH A.J.-

The appellant was charged under section 369 of the Ceylon Penal Code with the theft of cash Rs. 25 and a silver pendant and necklace.



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top