ROOSEMALACOCQ v. SALLY
1935 Present :
Koch A.J.
ROOSEMALACOCQ v. SALLY.
227-P. C. Colombo, 28,570.
Plea of guilt-Failure to
record verdict-Application to withdraw appeal-Refusal of permission-Subsequent
verdict of guilt-Irregularity- Criminal Procedure Code, s. 188 (1).
On a plea of guilt being tendered by an accused, the Magistrate did not
record a verdict of guilty, but remanded the accused for identification. On the
next date the accused asked that the evidence of a witness be recorded. When
this request was complied with, the accused withdrew his plea of guilt and
pleaded not guilty.
The Magistrate refused the application to withdraw the plea of guilt and
convicted the accused.
Held, that it was the duty of the Magistrate on the plea of guilt being
tendered to record a verdict of guilty and pass sentence; and that, in the
circumstances, the subsequent verdict could not stand.
APPEAL
from a conviction by the Police
Magistrate of Colombo.
L. A. Rajapakse, for accused, appellant.
Cur. adv. vult.
July 8, 1935. KOCH A.J.-
The appellant was charged under section 369 of the Ceylon Penal Code with the
theft of cash Rs. 25 and a silver pendant and necklace.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.