SABAPATHY v. HUNTLEY
1935 Present :
Maartensz and Koch JJ.
SABAPATHY v. HUNTLEY.
328-D. C. Avissawella, 1,635.
Defamation-Statements made
against Medical Officer-Charges of professional incompetence and negligence-Made
to Director of Medical and Sanitary Services-Communication to the Chairman of
Planters' Association who was also Member of Medical Wants
Committee-Privilege-Truth of statements a complete defence-Appeal-Question, of
fact-Decision of House of Lords-Evidence Ordinance, ss. 114 and 165.
Plaintiff, the District Medical Officer in charge of a Government hospital, sued
the defendant, a planter, for the recovery of damages arising from certain
defamatory statements made by the defendant , concerning the plaintiff.
The statements were made in a letter, which was addressed to the Director of
Medical and Sanitary Services, a copy of which was sent to the Chairman of the
Planters' Association of the District and was published in the newspapers as
part of the proceedings of a meeting of the Association.
The Chairman of the Association was also a member of the Medical Wants Committee
instituted under the provisions of the Medical Wants Ordinance, No. 12
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.