SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALISANDIRI v. THE KING


Alisandiri V. The King

[IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL.]

1936
Present : Lord Roche, Sir John Wallis, and

Sir George Rankin.

ALISANDIRI v. THE KING.

 Dying declaration-Evidence of signs made by person unable to speak-Nod of assent to question-Verbal statement-Evidence Ordinance, s. 32 (1).

Where a nod of assent was given by a person, who was unable to speak, to a question whether it was the accused that cut her neck,-

Held, that there was sufficient evidence of a verbal statement by the deceased within the meaning of section 32 (1) of the Evidence Ordinance.

Held, further, that evidence as to signs made in answer to questions put to the deceased was admissible but statements of witnesses as to what interpretation they put upon the signs were inadmissible.

Where apart from the evidence proceeding from the deceased woman, the other evidence was not sufficient to warrant a conviction but at the same time that other evidence was not merely consistent with the deceased's statement but pointed in the same direction,-

Held, that the conviction was justified.

THIS was an application for special leave to appeal against a judgment and sentence of the Supreme Court.

L. M.















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top