ALISANDIRI v. THE KING
[IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL.]
1936 Present : Lord Roche, Sir John Wallis, and
Sir George Rankin.
ALISANDIRI v. THE KING.
Dying
declaration-Evidence of signs made by person unable to speak-Nod of assent to
question-Verbal statement-Evidence Ordinance, s. 32 (1).
Where a nod of assent was given by a person, who was unable to speak, to a
question whether it was the accused that cut her neck,-
Held, that there was sufficient evidence of a verbal statement by the
deceased within the meaning of section 32 (1) of the Evidence Ordinance.
Held, further, that evidence as to signs made in answer to questions put
to the deceased was admissible but statements of witnesses as to what
interpretation they put upon the signs were inadmissible.
Where apart from the evidence proceeding from the deceased woman, the other
evidence was not sufficient to warrant a conviction but at the same time that
other evidence was not merely consistent with the deceased's statement but
pointed in the same direction,-
Held, that the conviction was justified.
THIS
was an application for special leave to
appeal against a judgment and sentence of the Supreme Court.
L. M.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.