GOONERATNE v. MAHADEVA
1936
Present: Akbar S.P.J.
GOONERATNE v. MAHADEVA.
83-P. C. Colombo, 38,414.
Criminal Procedure-Power of
Police Magistrate to try accused summarily as District Judge-Appointment of
Magistrate-Notification by Attorney-General-Presumption regarding official
acts-Evidence Ordinance, s. 114 -Criminal Procedure Code, s. 152 (3).
A Police Magistrate, who is also District Judge, has power to try summarily
under section 152 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code an accused person against
whom he has taken non-summary proceedings in respect of the same offence.
Where a notification appeared in the Government Gazette signed by the
Attorney-General to the effect that H. E. the Governor had appointed a certain
person to act as Police Magistrate during a stated period,-
Held, that a Court would presume that the appointment was regularly made.
APPEAL
from a conviction by the Police
Magistrate of Colombo.
H. V. Perera (with him N. E. Weerasooria, N. Nadarajah, and de
Jong), for accused, appellant.
J, E. M. Obeyesekere, Deputy S.-G. (with him H. W. R. Weerasooriya C.C.),
for Crown, respondent.
July, 1936. AKBAR S.P.J.-
Mr. H. V. Perera who appears
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.