ANGLO PERSIAN OIL CO. LTD. v. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX
NLR38V348
1935 Present :
Akbar S.P.J. and Koch J.
ANGLO-PERSIAN OIL CO., LTD. v. COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX.
162-(Inty.) Income Tax Special
Income tax-Contract for sale
of fuel oil made in London by company registered in V. K.-Delivery to shops at
Colombo by company's agent-Payment in London-Profits not arising in or derived
from Ceylon-Agent not instrumental in selling or disposing of property in
Ceylon-Ordinance No. 2 of 1932, ss. 5 and 34.
A contract was entered into in London by the appellant company, which was
registered in the United Kingdom, for the sale of fuel oil
(which was not a product of Ceylon) to shipowners, whose ships call at Colombo.
Delivery of the oil was to be made at Colombo by the agent of the company who
stored his own oil as well as the oil of the company, payment being made in
London on receipt of telegraphic advice of the quantity delivered each time. The
shipowners were bound to purchase all their requirements from the company, the
latter undertaking to have ready at Colombo sufficient oil to satisfy all their
requirements.
Held, that the profits of
the company from the contract were not liable to income tax under either section
5 or section 34 of the Income Tax Ordinance.
The profits of the company arise from contracts made in London and it cannot be
said from the mere act of delivery of the oil in Ceylon that the profits " arise
in or are derived from Ceylon " within the meaning of section 5 of the
Ordinance.
Section 34 is intended to include contracts which have been entered into as a
result of efforts of agents in Ceylon of a foreign principal even when such
contracts have been finally concluded outside Ceylon.
THIS
was a case stated for the opinion of the
Supreme Court under section 74 of the Income Tax Ordinance. The facts are stated
by Akbar J. as follows : -
The appellant is the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, Ltd., registered in the United
Kingdom, and its agent in Ceylon is the Anglo-Persian Oil Company (Ceylon),
Ltd., also registered in the United Kingdom. The appellant company enter into
contracts in London with shipowners whose ships call at various ports including
Colombo. In Colombo the appellant company, although it has no place of business,
stores its fuel oil with its agent, the Ceylon company, which has its place of
business in Colombo where it trades in fuel oil as part of its business. A
specimen form of the contract is attached and under it the appellant company
undertakes to supply fuel oil for the requirements of the shipping company's
vessels at certain named ports including Colombo and at a stated price per ton.
The shipping company on its part binds itself to buy from the appellant company
all the oil requirements of its vessels at the named ports and the total
estimated tons of oil for all the ports are also stated. The minimum quantity
which the shipping company undertakes to buy and the maximum quantity which it
may require the appellant to deliver during the period (which is also fixed) are
also stated. Clause 3 provides that the prices include delivery f.o.b. where
there are direct pipe lines, but where delivery is by barge (as in Colombo) the
shipping company pays an extra sum also paid per ton. The appellant company's
weights and measurements are to be accepted as conclusive but the shipping
company may also be represented at the measuring to verify the correctness of
the measurements. By clause 5 payment is to be made in London by cash nett on
receipt of the appellant's agent's telegraphic advice of the quantity delivered.
By clause 7 the shipping company had to give the appellant's agents at the named
ports forty-eight hours notice of each delivery required. Clause 9 states that
each delivery shall constitute a separate contract. The appellant has the right
to suspend or cancel the contract in the event of the shipping company failing
to make the payments prov