SATHASIVAM v. ATHARIYA
1936 Present :
Abrahams C.J. and Fernando A.J.
SATHASIVAM v. ATHARIYA
87-D. C. Colombo, 48,002.
Agreement-Settlement between
debtor and creditors-Agreement by third party to pay the deficit-Decision as to
amount of deficit-Binding on obligor.
O. L. M. was indebted to several creditors and a settlement was arrived at by
which it was agreed that the plaintiff respondent should receive his assets and
realize the proceeds for the benefit of his creditors. The first defendant gave
a mortgage bond to cover any deficit between the sum realized and O. L. M's
debts, the liability on the bond not to exceed Rs. 15,000. It was inter alia
agreed under the terms of the bond that the statement rendered to the defendant
by the plaintiff as receiver aforesaid of the amounts realized by the conversion
of the assets and book debts of O. L. M. shall be final, binding, and conclusive
on the defendant.
Held, that the agreement was valid.
An agreement to submit to the decision of one party to a contract any dispute
arising out of that contract is an exception to the doctrine that a party ought
not to be judge in his own cause.
APPEAL
from a judgment of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.