SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LETCHIMAN v. MURUGAPPA CHETTIAR


Letchiman V. Murugappa Chettiar

1936  Present : Moseley J. and Fernando A. J.

LETCHIMAN v. MURUGAPPA CHETTIAR.

72-D. C. Colombo, 6,741 (Testy).

Administration-Application on a copy of last will-proof of copy-Civil Procedure Code, s. 539 (c)-Evidence Ordinance, s. 63.

Where application is made for letters of administration with the copy of a will annexed under section 539 (c) of the Civil Procedure Code, the document produced must be proved in accordance with the terms of section 63 of the Evidence Ordinance.

APPEAL from an order of the District Judge of Colombo.

H. V. Perera (with him Kumarakulasingham), for appellant.

C. Thiagalingam (with him Nadesan), for defendant, respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

November 24, 1936. FERNANDO A. J.-

The petitioner applied as attorney of the widow of the deceased Narayan Chetty for letters of administration with copy of a will annexed, on the footing that the will had been executed by the deceased, Narayan Chetty.  The application was opposed by the fifth respondent, the present appellant, on various grounds.

Along with his petition, the petitioner fled the document marked X 7 which purports to be a copy issued by the Sub









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top