ARUNACHALAM CHETTIAR v. PAULIS APPUHAMY
1936 Present: Moseley J. and Fernando A.J.
ARUNACHALAM CHETTIAR v. PAULIS APPUHAMY.
142-D. C. Colombo, 51,848.
Mortgage decree-Time fixed for payment of money-Court's power to extend time on
cause shown-Civil Procedure Code, s. 343.
Where sufficient cause is shown for stay of the sale of property in execution of
a mortgage decree a Court has power to grant an extension of time for payment of
money due under the decree.
Ramanathan v. Ibrahim (36 N. L. R. 445) referred to.
APPEAL from an order of the District Judge of Colombo.
H. V. Perera (with him Wickremanayake), for defendant, appellant.
N. Nadarajah, for plaintiff, respondent.
Cur. adv. vult
November 10, 1936. FERNANDO A.J
.-
In this case a decree was entered on March 28, 1934, directing that order to
sell the mortgaged property was not to issue either until the defendant makes
default in the payment of certain sums which he agreed to pay on certain dates,
or till a period of two years from the date of the decree has expired. That
period having expired in March, 1936, the plaintiff applied for an order to
sell, and defendant applied for a further period within
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.