SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ELONONA v. FERNANDO


Elonona V. Fernando

1937   Present: Soertsz J.

In re AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 39 OF THE
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ORDINANCE

ELONONA
v. FERNANDO.

Workmen's Compensation Ordinance-Workmen injured while unloading machinery-Engaged previously in demolishing building-Not entitled to compensation-Ordinance No. 19 of 1934, s. 39.

A workman, who was injured while he was engaged in loading into a cart some dismantled machinery, which was being removed from an old building, which he was employed in demolishing the day previous to the accident, is not entitled to compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Ordinance.

CASE submitted for the decision of the Supreme Court under section 39 of the Workmen's Compensation Ordinance, No. 19 of 1934.

J. E. M. Obeyasekera, C.C. (Amicus curiae).

Cur. adv. vult.

March 10, 1937. SOERTSZ J.-

This is a matter submitted for the decision of this Court by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation under section 39 of Ordinance No. 19 of 1934.

The question is whether the deceased who was injured while he was engaged in loading some dismantled machinery into a cart on April 8, 1936, and who died in consequence of that injury on
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top