SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KARUNANAYAKE v. KARUNANAYAKE


Karunanayake V. Karunanayake

1937   Present : Maartensz and Hearne JJ.

KARUNANAYAKE
v. KARUNANAYAKE.

36-D.C.Galle, 34107.

Divorce-Amount of alimony-Determination of alimony-Dissolution of marriage-Wife's right to recover dowry-Roman-Dutch law-Matrimonial Rights and Inheritance Ordinance, s. 19.

Permanent alimony granted to a wife on the dissolution of a marriage is, as a rule, larger than alimony pending the action which is fixed by section 614 of the Civil Procedure Code at a sum not less than one-fifth of the husband's average nett income for the three years preceding the date of the order.

An order for the payment of permanent alimony should be made after the decree nisi dissolving the marriage is made absolute.

The amount of alimony may by consent of the parties be determined before the decree absolute.

On the dissolution of a marriage between parties who are governed by the Matrimonial Rights and Inheritance Ordinance of 1876, the wife is not entitled to recover movable property given to her as dowry, which becomes the absolute property of the husband, under section 19 of the Ordinance, unless the husband has contracted himself out of the provisions o













































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top