WIJEYSURIYA v. DALPADATU
1937 Present
:
Abrahams C.J.
WIJEYSURIYA v. DALPADATU.
420-P. C. Panadure, 41,828.
Notaries
Ordinance-Failure to transmit duplicates of deed-Duty of the
Registrar-General-Failure of notary to give an explanation-Ordinance No. 1 of
1907, s. 29, Rules 24 and 33-Amending Ordinance No. 10 of 1934, s. 6 (d).
The proviso to section 29 of the Notaries Ordinance does not impose an absolute
duty on the Registrar-General to give a notary who has failed to transmit to the
Registrar of Lands duplicates of documents in terms of rule 24, a further period
of time within which he may comply with the requirements of the rule.
Under rule 33 a Notary is bound to give an explanation in writing of any
irregularity, error, or omission which the Registrar-General discovers or thinks
he has discovered, and which appears to him to be a breach of the law.
Failure to give an explanation is an offence under section 29 of the Notaries
Ordinance.
APPEAL from a conviction by the Police Magistrate of Panadure. H. A. Koattegoda
(with him Dodwell Gunawardena), for appellant.
M. F. S. Pulle, C.C., for respondent.
Cur. adv. vult
September 29, 1937.
ABRAHAMS C.J.-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.